Forget default pathways we need guidance pathways first!

shutterstock_486362320 large web

The Work and Pensions Committee has recently recommended that every pension provider which offers drawdown should be required to offer a default decumulation pathway by April 2019.

Jonathan Watts-Lay, Director, WEALTH at work, comments;

“I find the idea of defaulting members into something without a positive choice being made extremely worrying for a number of reasons.”

Watts-Lay explains; “Firstly, although supporters of decumulation defaults see it as a means to a better outcome, history tells us otherwise.  Before Freedom and Choice many retirees purchased an annuity from their existing pension provider, in essence the default position, albeit the majority could have received better rates elsewhere. With default decumulation, we are effectively discouraging shopping around which means the winners are the providers putting the default solutions in place and probably not the member.

The effects of this could be extremely costly. For example, if an individual doesn’t respond to the ‘wake-up’ pack and is defaulted, there may be a number of consequences such as triggering the Money Purchase Annual Allowance or affecting means tested benefits.”

He adds; “In addition, as many individuals will have more than one pension (not forgetting other available savings and investments), if they default based on individual pots rather than the collective value, the likely outcome for many will be suboptimal, resulting in reduced income. This is because many will end up paying more tax than necessary or because they haven’t considered their changing income needs throughout retirement.”

Watts-Lay comments; “Secondly, I believe there are issues around the belief that ‘product innovation’ will solve all retirement income needs; rather than thinking about a broader service model which allows individuals to understand their options before they commit.

After all, in reality income drawdown isn’t a product at all! It’s a strategy for withdrawing retirement savings from a tax wrapper, ideally with other lifetime savings and financial options in mind.”

He adds; “It’s time we agreed that it’s not a ‘product’ issue but a guidance issue, where the answer is providing support before any product is sold or indeed defaulted. The solution is to get employees and members taking advantage of support services that already exist, in particular professional financial education and guidance and for some, regulated advice.

Although Pension Wise take up is relatively low, the user satisfaction is high and a more confident, knowledgeable individual is the result. Employees and members who access financial education programmes and workplace financial guidance services are equally satisfied.  Our experience is that they too emerge more confident, knowledgeable and more able to make informed decisions; it has been no surprise to see significant numbers of individuals changing their retirement plans, increasing pension contributions and seeking out regulated advice as a result.

In summary, we should be talking about ‘guidance pathways’ not ‘default pathways’!”

The latest news is brought to you by WEALTH at work, a leading financial wellbeing and retirement specialist. WEALTH at work and my wealth are trading names of Wealth at Work Limited which is a member of the Wealth at Work group of companies.

Links to websites external to those of Wealth at Work Limited (also referred to here as 'we', 'us', 'our' 'ours') will usually contain some content that is not written by us and over which we have no authority and which we do not endorse. Any hyperlinks or references to third party websites are provided for your convenience only. Therefore please be aware that we do not accept responsibility for the content of any third party site(s) except content that is specifically attributed to us or our employees and where we are the authors of such content. Further, we accept no responsibility for any malicious codes (or their consequences) of external sites. Nor do we endorse any organisation or publication to which we link and make no representations about them.